Administration's White Paper on Intellectual Property Enforcement Legislative Recommendations
Essay by people • June 30, 2011 • Term Paper • 6,164 Words (25 Pages) • 2,036 Views
Essay Preview: Administration's White Paper on Intellectual Property Enforcement Legislative Recommendations
INTRODUCTION
On June 22, 2010, the U.S. Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator (IPEC) issued the
Administration's first Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement (Strategy), which was
developed in coordination with many Federal agencies, including the Departments of Commerce,
Health and Human Services, Homeland Security (DHS), Justice (DOJ), and State, and the U.S. Trade
Representative. As part of the Strategy, the Administration undertook to review existing laws to ensure
that they were effective and to identify deficiencies that could hinder enforcement. Based on that
review, this White Paper identifies specific recommended legislative changes, designed to increase the
effectiveness of U.S. enforcement efforts. We will, of course, continue to assess existing legislation and
recommend any further changes to the law as the need arises.
Piracy and counterfeiting in the online environment are significant concerns for the Administration. They
cause economic harm and threaten the health and safety of American consumers. Foreign-based and
foreign-controlled websites and web services raise particular concerns for U.S. enforcement efforts. We
are aware that members of Congress share our goal of reducing online infringement and are considering measures to increase law enforcement authority to combat websites that are used to distribute or
provide access to infringing products. We look forward to working with Congress on those efforts and
the recommendations contained in this paper in the coming year.
Turning to the specific recommendations, the Administration recommends increasing the statutory
maxima for the following offenses:
1. Increase the statutory maximum for economic espionage (18 U.S.C. § 1831) from 15 years in
prison to at least 20 years in prison; and
2. Increase the statutory maxima for drug offenses under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic
Act (FFDCA), particularly for counterfeit drug offenses.
The Administration recommends that Congress: (1) direct the U.S. Sentencing Commission to increase
the U.S. Sentencing Guideline range for intellectual property offenses; (2) require the U.S. Sentencing
Commission to consider five specific categories of changes to the Guidelines; and (3) require the U.S.
Sentencing Commission to act within 180 days of such legislation being adopted (including issuing a
report explaining why it has not adopted any of the specific recommendations). The five categories of
specific recommendations for the U.S. Sentencing Commission are:
1. Increase the U.S. Sentencing Guideline range for the theft of trade secrets and economic espionage, including trade secrets transferred or attempted to be transferred outside of the U.S.;
2. Increase the U.S. Sentencing Guideline range for trademark and copyright offenses when
infringing products are knowingly sold for use in national defense, national security, critical
infrastructure, or by law enforcement.
3. Increase the U.S. Sentencing Guideline range for intellectual property offenses committed by
organized criminal enterprises/gangs;★ 2 ★
ADMINISTRATION'S WHITE PAPER ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ENFORCEMENT LEGISLATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS
4. Increase the U.S. Sentencing Guideline range for intellectual property offenses that risk death
or serious bodily injury and for those offenses involving counterfeit drugs (even when those
offenses do not present that risk); and
5. Increase the U.S. Sentencing Guideline range for repeat intellectual property offenders.
The Administration recommends three legislative changes to give enforcement agencies the tools they
need to combat infringement:
1. Clarify that, in appropriate circumstances, infringement by streaming, or by means of other
similar new technology, is a felony;
2. Authorize DHS, and its component U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), to share preseizure information about, and samples of, products and devices with rightholders to help DHS
to determine whether the products are infringing or the devices are circumvention devices; and
3. Give law enforcement authority to seek a wiretap for criminal copyright and trademark offenses.
The Administration recommends two legislative changes to allow DHS to share information about
enforcement activities with rightholders:
1. Give DHS authority to notify rightholders that infringing goods have been excluded or seized
pursuant to a U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) order; and
2. Give DHS authority to share information about, and samples of, circumvention devices with
rightholders post-seizure.
The Administration recommends six legislative changes to improve U.S. enforcement efforts involving
pharmaceuticals, including counterfeit drugs:
1. Require importers and manufacturers to notify the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and
other relevant agencies when they discover counterfeit drugs or medical devices, including the
known potential health risks associated
...
...