Best Management Practices
Essay by people • July 15, 2011 • Essay • 869 Words (4 Pages) • 1,892 Views
Abstract
Purpose - Management means "getting things done effectively through people". This implies the
importance of leadership and people skills in management practice to achieve optimal results. Great
managers usually succeed for a number of reasons. They usually possess nine common management
practices. This paper aims to identify these common denominators in their character and management
practice that define them.
Design/methodology/approach - Case examples are used to illustrate the application of those
management practices. Successful managers from well-known industry giants such as IBM, Nestle's,
P&G, Apple, Loews', GE and PepsiCo are profiled to demonstrate how their success can be traced back
to those practices.
Findings - The paper demonstrates that every manager can easily apply the nine management
practices daily to achieve a successful outcome. While some of these traits appear to be personal
habits, it is these simple management habits that influence subordinates to perform their best.
Originality/value - Most good managers are trained, not born. The nine personal practices
identified in this paper can be easily adopted on a daily basis. With consistent practice, the nine
personal traits help train managers to become more effective leaders in driving optimal performance
and motivating subordinates to "get things done effectively".
Keywords Management technique, Social skills, Motivation (psychology), Leadership,
Management development, Best practice
Paper type General review
Introduction
Management means getting things done effectively through people to achieve the
desired results. This requires a combination of leadership, communication and people
skills.
A manager without any leadership skills is like a ship sailing on high seas without a
compass and a gyroscope. The manager, in that case, is merely a bureaucrat pushing
paper and administering the daily chores and directives of higher-ups - a glorified
order-taker.
In his groundbreaking 1977 Harvard Business Review article, "Managers and
leaders, are they different?" professor Abraham Zaleznik illustrated the differences
between managers and leaders based on four attitudinal qualities: attitudes toward
goals; conceptions of work; relations with others; and sense of self (Zaleznik, 1977).
However, the twenty-first century managers must possess all those attributes. They
must proactively assume positive outlook, constantly shaping the competitive
landscape, and steering the firm to their desired course. Rather than accepting status
quo, they always examine alternatives and develop new approaches to problem
solving. Moreover, they emotionally connect with colleagues and subordinates by
establishing open communication links, thereby inviting new ideas and fresh
approaches to getting things done. They usually avoid getting bogged down by thebureaucratic process. Instead, they find ways to "bypass" or change the process to
steer clear of bottlenecks.
In the auto-biography, War as I Know It, General George Patton and author Rick
Atkinson described how the legendary second world war commander managed the
allies invasion of Sicily and the subsequent campaign to rescue encircled US
...
...