Fairchild Water Technologies, Inc.
Essay by Rohan D'cruz • May 23, 2018 • Case Study • 1,132 Words (5 Pages) • 1,247 Views
Page 1 of 5
Short Brief of:
Fairchild Water Technologies, Inc.
I. Major Issue / Problem
What mode of market entry should Fairchild Water Technologies, Inc. (FWT) utilize in order to break into the Indian market?
- Alternative Courses of Action
- Form a joint working arrangement with a licensee.
- Advantages:
- The financial risks associated with entering the Indian market are significantly lowered.
- There is currently no dominant water purifier manufacturer in India.
- FWT can gain market knowledge from the licensee.
- There will be a substantial decrease in future annual fixed costs after an Indian national is left in charge.
- Disadvantages:
- FWT will have no control over the licensee’s operations.
- The licensee’s royalty are the only profits FWT will earn.
- FWT will have to learn and adapt to a new environment and culture.
- No available resources for further expansion or growth.
- Quantitative:
- The licensee's payment to Fairchild will offset the initial financial investment of $35,000 resulting in costs of only about $65,000 for the first year- the initial annual fixed cost of $40,000 plus the field test cost of $25,000 (Exhibit 1).
- Fairchild will make a profit of about $3,620,714 and will need approximately 7,583 units in order to break-even (Exhibit 1).
- The break-even market share for the first year will be approximately 1.76% (Exhibit 1).
- Form a joint venture using a skimming price strategy.
- Advantages:
- There is currently no dominant water purifier manufacturer in India.
- FWT can gain market knowledge from a foreign partner.
- The financial risks associated with entering the Indian market will be shared between FWT and its foreign partner.
- FWT will earn 50% of profits as opposed to just royalty.
- FWT’s product (Delight) will be considerably superior to competitors’ products.
- Disadvantages:
- A higher financial risk is involved.
- FWT’s success will depend on the success of its selected partner.
- No resources available for further expansion or growth.
- FWT will have to learn and adapt to a new environment and culture.
- Higher priced product from skimming strategy may hinder the acceptance rate of the target market to the product.
- Quantitative:
- Using the dealer channels of distribution, approximately 7,500 units (or Rs. 4,875,000 / US $139,286) will need to be sold to break-even when operating in two regions. Approximately 12,885 units (or Rs. 8,375,000 / US $239,286) will need to be sold to break-even when operating in four regions. Approximately 55,192 units (or Rs. 35,875,000 / US $1,025,000) will need to be sold to break-even on a national operational scope. Break-even market share in the first year would range from 11.71% - 13.64% depending on the operational scope (Exhibit 2).
- Using the direct sales force distribution channel, approximately 12,950 units (or Rs. 6,475,000 / US $185,000) will need to be sold to break-even when operating in two regions. Approximately 23,750 units (or Rs. 11,875,000 / US $339,286) will need to be sold to break-even when operating in four regions. Approximately 119,750 units (or Rs. 59,875,000 / US $1,710,714) will need to be sold to break-even on a national operational scope. Break-even market share in the first year would range from 21.59% - 27.85% depending on the operational scope (Exhibit 3).
- Form a joint venture using a penetration price strategy.
- Advantages:
- There is currently no dominant water purifier manufacturer in India.
- FWT can gain market knowledge from a foreign partner.
- The financial risks associated with entering the Indian market will be shared between FWT and its foreign partner.
- The lowering of the selling price of Delight may result in higher sales volume.
- Disadvantages:
- A higher financial risk is involved.
- FWT’s success will depend on the success of its selected partner.
- No resources available for further expansion or growth.
- FWT will have to learn and adapt to a new environment and culture.
- Lowering the selling of price of Delight may cause consumers to view it as a low quality product.
- Quantitative:
- Using the dealer channels of distribution, approximately 16,250 units will need to be sold to break-even when operating in two regions. Approximately 27,917 units will need to be sold to break-even when operating in four regions. Approximately 119,750 units will need to be sold to break-even on a national operational scope. Break-even market share in the first year would range from 25.38% - 29.55% depending on the operational scope (Exhibit 4).
- Using the direct sales force channel of distribution, approximately 32,375 units will need to be sold to break-even when operating in two regions. Approximately 59,375 units will need to be sold to break-even when operating in four regions. Approximately 299,375 units will need to be sold to break-even on a national operational scope. Break-even market share in the first year would range from 53.98% - 69.62% depending on the operational scope (Exhibit 5).
- Recommended Course of Action
I recommend Fairchild Water Technologies, Inc. form a joint working arrangement with a licensee, for the following reasons:
- FWT will incur the least amount of financial risk and commitment through this market entry strategy.
- This strategy will allow FWT to break even much more quickly than it would if it pursued a joint venture entry strategy.
- Summary
Based on the facts listed above and the given information, FWT should form a joint working arrangement with a licensee by actively communicating with the licensee in order to leverage his/her marketing knowledge. FWT should also remain aware of operations and once it has been successful in this entry strategy, it will gain more opportunity to move to a joint venture or direct investment in the Indian market.
Appendix
Exhibit 1 – Calculations for joint working arrangement with a licensee
Sales (units) | 430,000 |
Average royalty per unit (Rs.) | * 300 |
Revenue (Rs.) | Rs.129,000,000 |
Costs (US$) | |
Production facilities | $30,000 |
Office equipment | $5,000 |
Licensee payment to FWT | ($35,000) |
Annual fixed cost | $40,000 |
Field test | $25,000 |
Total Costs (US$) | $65,000 |
...
...
Only available on OtherPapers.com