Go Go Go

Would you have children with a woman who could pass that disease onto a child? Some people say yes, me? I would never risk destroying a child's life like that. Does that make me evil and shallow?

Now, in this case a woman will not likely show many (if any) signs of such a disease, but what about other diseases? What if you knew a woman was unhealthy with something she could pass onto a child? Would you have children with her? You might. Not me.

Do you know you have another annoying habit of constantly comparing human beings with lesser beasts? However, regarding your little comment here - explain how it is that "good looking," "successful" persons can get cancer or parkinson's disease?

You're running yourself around in circles. Of course good looking people can get such diseases. Oh, look what I found:

"Studies done largely in the US have found that facial symmetry may be important because it is evidence that the person grew up in a healthy way, without visible genetic defects. Other studies have also shown that the length and height of the cheekbones may contribute strongly to beauty. These studies were conducted by scientists who asked volunteers to rate a series of photographs on the basis of beauty. The attributes common to all images rated beautiful were then picked out."

Beauty is an indicator of genetic health.

[you know] as well as I that someone who appears "fat" could be very healthy and naturally have a large disposition. How could pass that statement off as fact? Damn sloppy.

Fact: Fat people are prone to many diseases such as high blood pressure, heart disease, breathing problems such as asthma, liver disease, diabetes, breast and colon cancer etc, etc, etc....

Get your FACTS right

You said the so called definition changes based on different situations which is another way of saying there is no specific definition. Also, my inference is not in question here, it is yours. You seem to think that only "Alphas" should breed.

No, I don't have an opinon, what I said was Alphas get the pick of the crop.

Again, what do you mean by "best members?" I've seen the decadence of the "rich," "strong," and "successful" as well as the decadence of their mates. You mean to tell me they are "Alpha?" Remember, if you deny this, then you will contradict yourself again. "Scientifically," in the context of our "society," of course, they should be the strongest, smartest, and wisest of us all, the "successful," and they are not.

You