Integrative Review of Workplace Learning and Its Outcomes
Essay by Agbf • June 10, 2017 • Research Paper • 6,433 Words (26 Pages) • 1,326 Views
Essay Preview: Integrative Review of Workplace Learning and Its Outcomes
Integrative Review of Workplace learning and its outcomes
Measures of Workplace Learning
Regarding the measurement issues of workplace learning, numerous researchers have attempted to measure learning activities in the workplace (Bartlett, 2001; Birdi, Allan, & Warr, 1997; Doornbos, Simons, & Denessen, 2008; Enos, Kehrhahn, & Bell, 2003; Maurer & Tarulli, 1994; Maurer, Weiss, & Barbeite, 2003; Noe & Wilk, 1993; Rowden, 2002; Tannenbaum & Yukl, 1992; Tsai & Tai, 2003). However, these studies have focused on either training or informal learning. Nevertheless, the review of these studies may suggest the measures for workplace learning embracing both formal learning and informal learning for this study.
Table 2 summarizes measures of workplace learning in previous research. The most commonly used measure in previous research is frequency of participation in training and engagement in learning activities (Bartlett, 2001; Birdi, Allan, & Warr, 1997; Doornbos, Simons, & Denessen, 2008; Maurer & Tarulli, 1994; Maurer, Weiss, & Barbeite, 2003). Other measures in terms of quantity are the number of courses, the number of hours, and the number of courses for future activities (Noe & Wilk, 1993).
Additionally, perceived aspects of measures in workplace learning are used. For example, participants are asked to rate the extent to which they perceived they learned the skills through learning activities (Enos, Kehrhahn, & Bell, 2003). More specific measurements for individual’s perceptions toward workplace learning were used by the Bartlett (2001). He used employee attitudes toward training with perceived access to training, perceived support for training, motivation to learn from training, and perceived benefits of training.
Table 2. A summary of Measures of Workplace Learning
Research | Scope of Workplace Learning | Measures | Assessment |
Doornbos, Simons, & Denessen (2008) | Informal work-related learning | Frequency of engagement in learning activities based on Learner’s perception of work-related learning; A seven-point Likert-type rating scale ranging from never (0) to everyday (6); respondents were asked to rate the frequency in which they engaged in learning activities
They categorized workplace learning into 6 types in terms of intentionality of learning (spontaneous learning, deliberate learning), developmental relatedness (individual learning, learning together, and learning from others), and interaction (partner’s professional practice and hierarchical position (within: high, within: peer, within: low, outside, expert, new, peer, outsider) | Self-report |
Noe & Wilk (1993) | Development activity focused on classroom programs (e.g. courses, programs, seminars, workshops offered both in-house and externally offered) |
|
** Little convergence between self-report and objective measures of development activity |
Birdi, Allan, & Warr (1997) | Training and development | Frequency of participation in the previous 12 months; how many times a person had undertaken each activity in the previous 12 months, such as training, personal projects, college or university courses -tuition reimbursement | Self-report; Employees were asked to describe their level of participation in 13 separate activities over the preceding 12-month period. |
Maurer, Weiss, & Barbeite (2003) | Learning and development activities | Frequency of participation; both activities performed during work hours or job time (where most work-related development likely occurs) and activities completed during non-work hours, including participation in college or continuing education courses, taking different job assignments, using prerecorded audio or video tapes, reading relevant books, consulting with career counselors, and asking for feedback | Self-report |
Maurer & Tarulli (1994) | Voluntary employee development activity | Frequency of participation
| Self-report |
Enos, Kehrhahn, & Bell (2003) | Formal and informal learning activities | Perceived extent of informal learning based on each managerial skill; for each managerial skills, participants rated the extent to which they perceived they learned the skills through informal learning activities, measuring on a four-point scale (1= learned only from formal learning activities, 2= learned mostly from formal learning activities, 3= learned mostly from informal learning activities, 4= learned only from informal learning activities) | Self-report |
Bartlett (2001) | Training | Employee attitudes toward training
| Self-report |
Rowden (2002) | Formal and informal learning | Measures
| Self-report Respondents’ perceptions of each learning with 6-point Likert scale based on the degree of agreement |
Tannenbaum & Yukl (1992) | Training (Participation in training) | Employees’ participation in making pre-training decisions | Self-report Whether employees have the choice of attending or not attending training programs, or whether or not they have choices in selection of training contents. |
Tsai & Tai (2003) | Training (Participation in training) | Training assignment | Self-report Whether trainees are forced to attend training or attend the training program voluntarily. One item was used to assess training assignment; Is your attendance of the training program to be mandatory or voluntary? |
...
...