Kodak Case Analysis
Essay by Chaitanya Nandurkar • March 4, 2018 • Case Study • 1,534 Words (7 Pages) • 1,010 Views
Backg
Page | 3
Overview
The case starts with the premise of how Kodak came to be synonymous with photography in the late
19th century and grew to be an industry stalwart over the course of the first half of the 20th century
in the United States. Being a technologically advanced company that placed customer needs first,
backed with a strong emphasis on advertising, low-cost mass production and continuous innovation,
Kodak decimated most of its competition during the imaging revolution in the early 1900s.
Investing heavily early-on in research, the company introduces superior color film technology in the
1960s after 4 decades of research. The corporation’s competition was blindsided by the advent of
Kodak’s consistently reproducible new product offerings and scrambled to launch products that
could compete in the new market. This prescience on Kodak’s part bolstered the company to
monopolize the imaging industry, unchallenged.
Fast forwarding to 1980s, Kodak is faced with a changing landscape within the imaging industry. The
case clearly illustrates how the culture of a company plays a crucial role in either its continued
dominance or pitiful downfall. Over the course of 90 years, the company has transformed from a
consumer-focused, technologically advanced enterprise to one that solely cares about the bottom
line. Despite spending billions on research, Kodak ignores its competitors’ advancements, its internal
technological innovations, and especially analyses of declining film sales and reducing market shares.
The company continues to revel in its past glory and is so steeped in its razor-blade business model
that it refuses to acknowledge it may be “missing the boat”.
The case discusses Kodak’s attempt to navigate the choppy waters of the changing landscape as it
struggles with an identity crisis, and its efforts to maintain its position as a pioneer within an
increasingly competitive industry.
Page | 4
1. Evaluate Kodak’s strategy in traditional photography. Why has the company been so
successful throughout the history of the industry?
● George Eastman developed and the patented the dry plates photographic plates, which
were far superior and convenient to use than the traditional, cumbersome wet plate
technology. Mr. Eastman eventually developed the transparent film roll as we have come to
know it, a significant advancement from glass plate photography.
● Despite some early challenges, Kodak was one of the earliest imaging companies whose
innovations cemented its position as a pioneer in photography and soon became a
household name. The company took pride in its quality of products and strived to maintain
its competitive edge through use of extensive advertising, marketing strategies, low-cost
mass production and consumer centric products.
● Being an early player in the game, Kodak leveraged its brand presence and forged strong
relationships with retailers to capture large markets. This bolstered the company’s position
in the market since customers preferred a familiar Kodak product over competitors with
advanced offerings. In addition to that, their photo-finishing process soon became an
industry standard and was developed to be easily replicated in photo shops, a crucial
process that many competitors struggled with - making their technologies just as efficient
and consistent. Kodak rose to prominence in an era of less competition and continued to use
its speed to market, customer loyalty and technological advancements to squash emerging
players within the industry.
● The company remained very innovative in its first four decades of existence, spending
millions in continuing research, pioneering in color films and launching home-movie cameras
in the 1930s. Kodak had the ability to foresee the future of imaging in the 1920s and
invested early in researching color film technologies. The company decimated its
competition during the era of color film and grew substantially to rake in $10 billion in
revenue by 1981 and monopolized the film and camera market in the United States.
● Kodak’s biggest success and market dominance in its early years could be attributed to their
“razor-blade” business model - where the camera equipment was intentionally designed to
be minimalistic and low priced, and most of the revenue was generated from the sale of
films. The company followed Eastman’s philosophy of mass production at low cost, and
rarely experimented with new technologies that could hurt its bottom line. The company
capitalized the
...
...