Marketing

Scenario 1

The defense that Daniel would have in regards to the situations that took place would be the following:

In regards to being fired he could file a lawsuit that he was fired without correct cause. He was outside of work and it did not involve anything to do with his job nor did the boss know the consequences of why his son smelled of alcohol.

In the event of the shooting; Daniel had a legal right to carry a gun. He felt his life was in danger and did NOT know the gun being pointed at him was not loaded. He was legally allowed to protect himself and his family.

Daniel could sue the concession people for giving him the wrong the soft drink putting him into a coma.

Scenario 2

Anna has the right to sue the restaurant along with the doctor. She was given food with glass causing physical harm. She can also sue the doctor for malpractice taking off her leg instead of fixing her tongue. She can also sue for pain and suffering as well as mental anguish.

There might also be a legal act that can take place as the exit was not appropriate for the event of a fire. The trampled woman could sue for that.

Scenario 3

Raul can sue his boss for bodily harm or intent to injure. Raul was fired legally and cannot retaliate against her for that. His boss cannot retailiate for him protesting in front of the building but when she fired the staple gun at him there was a chance it would cause bodily harm which it did to his eye.