OtherPapers.com - Other Term Papers and Free Essays
Search

Marx and Modern Times

Essay by   •  May 19, 2011  •  Essay  •  792 Words (4 Pages)  •  3,867 Views

Essay Preview: Marx and Modern Times

Report this essay
Page 1 of 4

Marx's theory of estranged labor is clearly portrayed throughout Charles Chaplin's film, Modern Times. In "Estranged Labor," Marx summarizes his theory as "the misery of the worker is in inverse proportion to the power and volume of his production" (Marx, 1). The film, which takes place in the industrial era, follows the demanding life of a factory worker and his job fastening nuts onto a product as it furthers its way down the assembly line. The monotonous labor's alienating consequences are clearly shown at the start of the movie during Chaplin's character's efforts in attempting to persist in the tediousness and constant quickening pace of factory work. This cyclical lifestyle leads Chaplin's character to eventually suffer from a nervous breakdown. Chaplin's character in Modern Times is an ideal portrayal of Marx's theory of estranged labor.

In "Estranged Labor," Marx contends that society is divided into two conflicting classes by the capitalist structure of production. There are those who own and are in charge of the means of production, the bourgeoisie, and there are those who are the workers at the means of production, the proletariat. The worker becomes alienated in this system because as a non-owner, he or she is obliged to sell their labor to those who do. Marx further divides this alienation of the worker into four groups, all of which are depicted in Modern Times. There is alienation of the laborer from his "species-being," from his work's final product, from his fellow men, and from the production process.

Chaplin's character is unable to function as a human while still being a valuable worker, which is an example of being estranged from his "species-being." He falls behind in his work and must rush to catch up just by simple acts like scratching his skin. The most fruitful laborer at a factory would be the one who is able to turn himself into a machine, blinded by any feelings or thoughts that may cause a disruption.

Marx argues that the alienation of men to men is the result of the alienation of the laborer from the product he is working to create (Marx, 7). This is apparent in Modern Times when Chaplin's character cannot keep up with the conveyer belt, which is going extremely fast. The conveyer belt does not stop and the product goes onto the next worker without Charles' work to it being done. The stress creates an argument between Chaplin and his fellow worker, which only makes them fall even more behind in their work. The supervisor shouts at the two workers, which only causes them to bicker even more, each one pointing the finger and placing guilt on the other. However, the guilt should be placed on the factory itself, or even the system of production.

The product of the worker's labor is alien to the worker (Marx, 2). Chaplin's character is completely unfamiliar with

...

...

Download as:   txt (4.5 Kb)   pdf (70.2 Kb)   docx (10.2 Kb)  
Continue for 3 more pages »
Only available on OtherPapers.com