Ust Inc Case Study
Essay by people • August 24, 2011 • Study Guide • 326 Words (2 Pages) • 3,432 Views
3. Should UST Inc. undertake the $1 billion recapitalization? Calculate the marginal (or incremental)
effect on UST's value, assuming that the entire recapitalization is implemented immediately
(January 1, 1999).
(a)Assume a 38% tax rate.
(b)Prepare a pro-forma income statement to analyze whether UST will be able to make interest
payments.
(c)For the basic analysis, assume the $1 billion in new debt is constant and perpetual.
Should UST alter the new debt via a different level or a change in the amount of debt through time?
a) UST should undertake the $1 billion recapitalization.
The marginal effect on UST's value of implementing the recapitalization, assuming
that the plan is implemented immediately on January 1, 1999, is equal to the sum of
the tax shield minus the present value of financial distress.
VL = VU + Tax Shield Expected Bankruptcy Cost
à VL = VU + tD - PV (Financial Distress)
à VL = VU + tD - (probability of bankruptcy * cost of bankruptcy)
à VL = VU + tD - (probability of bankruptcy * (g * VU))
Where g is some constant that is usually valued between 5% and 30%
Therefore, the marginal effect is:
?VL = tD - (probability of bankruptcy * (g * VU))
= (0.38)($1billion) - (0.0028)(0.30)($6.5billion)
= $0.375 billion
Notes:
(1) The probability of bankruptcy is inferred using an AAA credit rating (from lecture
notes). See spreadsheet, row EBIT interest coverage ratio. The ratio after
recapitalization falls into the AAA rank which has a ratio of 12.9.
(2) g, or the constant fraction of VU that we lose in event of bankruptcy, is given a
conservative estimate of 0.30 for conservative reasons.
(3) VU, or the value of the unlevered firm, is obtained by summing USTs market
capitalization ($6.4billion) and long-term debt ($0.1billion) in 1998. Although the
firm is technically levered (D/V = 1.5%)
...
...