OtherPapers.com - Other Term Papers and Free Essays
Search

In What Ways Did the Use of Nuclear Weapons Against Japan Change International Relations?

Essay by   •  July 18, 2011  •  Case Study  •  1,685 Words (7 Pages)  •  2,639 Views

Essay Preview: In What Ways Did the Use of Nuclear Weapons Against Japan Change International Relations?

Report this essay
Page 1 of 7

Name:

Tutor:

Course:

Date:

University:

In what ways did the use of nuclear weapons against Japan Change international relations?

On August 6 1945, Hiroshima a coastal city with over three hundred people became the first target ever of an atomic bomb. Killing instantly about 71000 men women and children mostly by sudden fatal burning and secondary fires ten thousands were to die slowly of wounds burns and radiation sickness. On August 7 the same fatal fate befell Nagasaki, a harbour city on Japan opposite western shore .A few days later Japan surrendered (bulleting of atomic scientist, 1970)

International relation could no longer remain unaffected by proliferation of the nuclear weapon in the world. The first use of atomic bomb symbolized the ever widening gap between mans dynamic progress in the attainment of destructive capacity through science and technology and his corresponding lack of progress in area of peace and security. In his message to congress President Truman on October in 3 1943 stated that; 'International relations as in domestic affairs, release of atomic energy constitutes a new force to revolutionary to consider in framework of old ideas. (Viner, 1946 p 53).

The use of nuclear weapons meant that that nations were the only legitimate international actor and the only foundation for national defence since states in the nuclear power had ability to annihilate one another, no state would be willing to take a nuclear risk for another one, since its every survival would be at stake. Secondly no state could fully trust one another. Nuclear bipolarity forced all non -nuclear states to line up in their respective blocks, and prevented legitimate emergence of other nuclear actors. Nuclear weapons and threat had an influence on how states and statement acts. For these reasons the use of nuclear weapons would not, could not and will not be ignored. (Lewis, 1999. p225)

International relation as a system of interaction between nations underwent major changes. From the end of the Second World War up to the end of cold war in 1991 several issues gained prominence in the international relations. These are; strengthened existence of non state actors as vital players in international relations, energy, environment, terrorism, globalization, communication and revolution. Although the world become unipolar as the United States remained the only super power. The present international relations became more interdependent due to spread of globalization and international trade, information technology evolution, terrorism and environmental degradation. States started to seek cooperation from other states and compete with each other as they became largely dependent with each other. (aneek chaterjee, 2010 p7)

After the bombing of Japan surrendered and this led to the end of the second ward war. This was seen by many in Britain as blessing in disguise as it provided a unique rapture in the international relations and provided an opportunity for its reconstruction into a peaceful and lasting form. He focus shifted in united nation organisations and allied agencies. (The Journal American History published, 2011)

Use of nuclear weapons haunted every international conference and treaties.First and vital cause of use of nuclear weapons against the Japan led to the cold war. "Cold war was a product of clash between Soviet Union and American Ideologies and stuggle for advantage between the two and the personality of John Stalin"( Colin S Gray 2007). In addition it caused a split to the second world wars allies especially between the United States and the Soviet Union. There two issues that strained the relationship of the United States and Soviet Union. The secrecy of manufacturing of the atomic bomb and the sequential dropping of the bomb in Japan. Soviet Union viewed this as betrayal of trust between the two super powers. This became the beginning of mutual suspicion and mistrust that led to mutual distrust between the two nations. United States continued to enjoy the monopoly of the nuclear bomb until 1949 when Soviet Union acquired nuclear, consequently the United States dominated the international relations and policies. Race for arms and military alliances became order of the day in late forties and late fifties. Nuclear weapons encouraged a process of bipolarization in the international relations. Newly independent weak and small countries felt freighted by destructive capabilities of nuclear weapons hence they sought protection of one or the other nuclear power. Later on proliferation of these very weapons were very instrumental in breaking up bipolar world and ushering in multi polar world (Malhotra 2006 pg 349 -52)

After proliferation of nuclear weapons threat to international peace increased and the future to international peace became uncertain, the mutual suspicion between the United States and Soviet Union avoided confrontation between them. However there were ideological differences. After the bombing of Japan these countries knew the adverse destruction of the nuclear weapons. Great destruction of nuclear weapons rendered their use prohibitive.

Mutual suspicion and need for cease fire and the need the avoid confrontation caused countries to form treaties to avert future use of nuclear powers in a destructive way .After the Cuban Missile crisis and after the Japan nuclear bombing countries realized the of igning treaties. In 1962 a partial test treaty (PTBT) was signed in Moscow banning all nuclear testing under water or space. United states, Britain, Soviet Union, signed the treaty but France and China did not reducing the effectiveness of (PTBT) after ward nunclear non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) was signed. To date 189 states have signed.North Korea signed but later withdrew in 2003. NPT had three areas non-proliferation, disarmament and right to peaceful use of nuclear energy. Member countries met in Newyork and extended NPT indefinitely. India and Pakistan declined to sign NPT. The two countries felt NPT is discriminatory as it created imbalance

...

...

Download as:   txt (11.2 Kb)   pdf (129.9 Kb)   docx (13.4 Kb)  
Continue for 6 more pages »
Only available on OtherPapers.com