Leading a Wave of Hybirds

Conflict causes interaction at a level more powerful than that of competition. Though, as Schelling notes, competition, conflict, and cooperation are intrinsically interdependent, conflict occurs when challenging groups' goals, needs, objectives, or values clash and violence, though not necessarily aggression, is a result.

Early psychologists frequently proposed that there was an inborn instinctual or organic mechanism which would dispose humans towards violence. This leads to the composition of the instinct theories of violence. This theory shared elements of early psychological studies and social Darwinian theories concerning the fight for endurance. This theory was then disgraced by biologists who did not consider that such a mechanism survived.

Social learning theory is focused on the hypothesis that violence is not innate or instinctual however in reality learned through the procedure of socialization. This hypothesis is the argument of the Seville Statement. One obtains aggressive traits by learning them in school, at home, and by interaction with their surroundings in general. Interaction in culture helps to focus and generate stored violence onto enemies. This is an important thought, mainly when the disagreement is ethno-national or sectarian in environment. Social learning theorists have tried to know the relationship of the relationship conflict and the task conflict.

Literature Review

Conflict is a state of resistance, disagreement, or incompatibility among two or more individuals or groups of individuals, which is sometimes distinguished by physical violence. Forces conflict among states can constitute war.

One of the most outstanding characteristics of conflict is that it is almost intrinsic to the

life and dynamics of group. "Conflict is found in interpersonal relations" (Pruitt and

Carnevale, 1993), "In intra-group and inter-group relatives" (Jehn, 1995), "In planning of decision-making" (Amason, 1996).

Study by Jehn (1995), Amason (1996), De Dreu and Weingart in (2003)offers evidence that this double-edged outcome is attributable to dissimilar dimensions of conflict. Study has revealed that conflict to be multidimensional (Amason, 1996; De Dreu, 1994). Therefore, it is probable for one aspect of conflict to increase effectiveness while another hinders agreement and promise among group associates. Jehn (1995) distinguished among two types of intra-group conflict:

1. task conflict,

2. Relationship conflict.

Task conflict is an insight of disagreement betwe