Psychology and Scientific Thinking
Essay by abpears • March 3, 2016 • Study Guide • 1,795 Words (8 Pages) • 1,279 Views
Chapter 1: Psychology and Scientific Thinking
Common sense: useful in some cases, but extremely wrong in other
Founder of American Psychology: William James
Psychologists disagree on many things, but agree that PSYCH IS NOT EASY TO DEFINE
Psychology
= THE STUDY OF THE MIND, BRAIN, AND BEHAVIOR
- spans multiple levels of analysis
- lower levels are biological (brain)
- higher levels are social (mind)
- LOW molecular → neurochemical → neurological/physiological → mental → behavior → social HIGH
Why is human behavior so difficult to predict?
- Actions are multiply determined
- produced my many factors
- skeptical of single-variable explanations
- ex.: explaining violence with poverty as a single factor (genes, bad upbringing, etc.)
- psychological influences are rarely independent of each other, making it difficult to pin down causes is operating what
- so many interrelated factors makes pinpointing causes difficult
- ex.: anorexia nervosa
- Individual differences
- people differ in their thinking and respond in different ways to the same situation
- makes it difficult to come up with explanations that apply universally
- People influence each other
- reciprocal determinism (Albert Bandura: we mutually influence everyone’s behavior
- Behavior is shaped by culture
- chinese vs. American/Europeans see different things in pictures (eye-tracking technology)
- Chinese focus on detail
Why Can’t We Always Trust Common Sense?
- Naïve Realism
= belief that we see the world precisely as it is (seeing is believing)
- much of the time this is true, BUT appearances can be deceiving
- ex. Earth may seem flat, common sense assures us we are being objective, but people who don’t share our beliefs are biased
- Look at many proverbs
- they oppose each other, common sense leads us to believe two opposites
*** Common sense is right to:
- snap judgments whether someone we have just watched on TV is trustworthy or not
- helpful guide to make hypotheses
- happy employees=more productive
PSYCHOLOGY IS A SCIENCE
Science is not a book knowledge; it is a systematic APPROACH to evidence
→ begins with empiricism: knowledge should be based on what is gained by observation
→ careful of naïve realism however because observations do fool
→ people think it isn’t because it is more intuitive/simpler; HOWEVER harder because it is more challenging to predict things like behavior
Scientific Theory:
Explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world; ties many findings together
→ generates novel predictions that researchers can test (HYPOTHESES)
- can never be proved
- consistent with much evidence
- theory is a GENERAL EXPLANATION; Hypothesis is a SPECIFIC PREDICITON
SOME MISCONCEPTIONS:
- theory does not explain one specific event
- a theory is not just an educated guess
- All general explanations about how the world works are theories
Scientists fall into many traps . . . (need to use scientific safeguards)
- Confirmation bias
= tendency to seek out evidence that supports our beliefs and denies, dismisses, or distorts evidence that contradicts them
- causes us to focus on evidence that supports our beliefs and gives us tunnel vision
- ex. Wason Selection Task
- 2 cards to test hypothesis that all cards have a vowel on one side and an odd number on the other side
- most people pick E and 5 but the 5 can only confirm the hypothesis NOT disconfirm it
- must choose 4 to see if it has vowel on the opposite side
- fools us very easily
- Belief Perseverance
= tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them
Metaphysical Claims:
Assertions about the world that we can’t test
Ex. God’s existence, soul, afterlife
- must distinguish from scientific claims
- difference? Could never test using scientific methods
- untestable
- religion vs. science
- religion is untestable, moral
- science can be answered with data
GOOD SCIENTISTS
- aware they may be mistaken
- always open to provision
- prescription for humility
- scientists never claim to prove their theories and avoid committing to definitive conclusions unless the evidence supporting is overwhelming
- popular phrases: suggests, appears (allows room for adaptations)
Growth of psychology → Misinformation Explosion
- Pseudoscience
- Imposter of science, seemingly scientific but not; lacks safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize SCIENCE
- Pseudoscience can be tested while metaphysical claims can’t be
- Ex. ESP: many Americans convinced even though weak evidence; however, good we are open-minded but bad we are so convinced
Warning Signs of Pseudoscience
...
...