OtherPapers.com - Other Term Papers and Free Essays
Search

Psychology and Scientific Thinking

Essay by   •  March 3, 2016  •  Study Guide  •  1,795 Words (8 Pages)  •  1,279 Views

Essay Preview: Psychology and Scientific Thinking

Report this essay
Page 1 of 8

Chapter 1: Psychology and Scientific Thinking

 

Common sense: useful in some cases, but extremely wrong in other

Founder of American Psychology: William James

Psychologists disagree on many things, but agree that PSYCH IS NOT EASY TO DEFINE

Psychology

= THE STUDY OF THE MIND, BRAIN, AND BEHAVIOR

  • spans multiple levels of analysis
  • lower levels are biological (brain)
  • higher levels are social (mind)
  • LOW molecular  neurochemical  neurological/physiological  mental  behavior  social HIGH

Why is human behavior so difficult to predict?

  1. Actions are multiply determined
  • produced my many factors
  • skeptical of single-variable explanations
  • ex.: explaining violence with poverty as a single factor (genes, bad upbringing, etc.)

  1. psychological influences are rarely independent of each other, making it difficult to pin down causes is operating what
  • so many interrelated factors makes pinpointing causes difficult
  • ex.: anorexia nervosa

  1. Individual differences
  • people differ in their thinking and respond in different ways to the same situation
  • makes it difficult to come up with explanations that apply universally
  1. People influence each other
  • reciprocal determinism (Albert Bandura: we mutually influence everyone’s behavior
  1. Behavior is shaped by culture
  • chinese vs. American/Europeans see different things in pictures (eye-tracking technology)
  • Chinese focus on detail

Why Can’t We Always Trust Common Sense?

  1. Naïve Realism

= belief that we see the world precisely as it is (seeing is believing)

  • much of the time this is true, BUT appearances can be deceiving
  • ex. Earth may seem flat, common sense assures us we are being objective, but people who don’t share our beliefs are biased

  1. Look at many proverbs
  • they oppose each other, common sense leads us to believe two opposites

*** Common sense is right to:

  • snap judgments whether someone we have just watched on TV is trustworthy or not
  • helpful guide to make hypotheses
  • happy employees=more productive

PSYCHOLOGY IS A SCIENCE

Science is not a book knowledge; it is a systematic APPROACH to evidence

 begins with empiricism: knowledge should be based on what is gained by observation

 careful of naïve realism however because observations do fool

 people think it isn’t because it is more intuitive/simpler; HOWEVER harder because it is more challenging to predict things like behavior

Scientific Theory:

Explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world; ties many findings together

 generates novel predictions that researchers can test (HYPOTHESES)

  • can never be proved
  • consistent with much evidence
  • theory is a GENERAL EXPLANATION; Hypothesis is a SPECIFIC PREDICITON

SOME MISCONCEPTIONS:

  1. theory does not explain one specific event
  2. a theory is not just an educated guess
  • All general explanations about how the world works are theories

Scientists fall into many traps . . . (need to use scientific safeguards)

  1. Confirmation bias

= tendency to seek out evidence that supports our beliefs and denies, dismisses, or distorts evidence that contradicts them

  • causes us to focus on evidence that supports our beliefs and gives us tunnel vision
  • ex. Wason Selection Task
  • 2 cards to test hypothesis that all cards have a vowel on one side and an odd number on the other side
  • most people pick E and 5 but the 5 can only confirm the hypothesis NOT disconfirm it
  • must choose 4 to see if it has  vowel on the opposite side
  • fools us very easily

  1. Belief Perseverance

= tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them

Metaphysical Claims:

        Assertions about the world that we can’t test

                Ex. God’s existence, soul, afterlife

  • must distinguish from scientific claims
  • difference? Could never test using scientific methods
  • untestable
  • religion vs. science
  • religion is untestable, moral
  • science can be answered with data

GOOD SCIENTISTS

  • aware they may be mistaken
  • always open to provision
  • prescription for humility
  • scientists never claim to prove their theories and avoid committing to definitive conclusions unless the evidence supporting is overwhelming
  • popular phrases: suggests, appears (allows room for adaptations)

Growth of psychology  Misinformation Explosion

  • Pseudoscience
  • Imposter of science, seemingly scientific but not; lacks safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize SCIENCE
  • Pseudoscience can be tested while metaphysical claims can’t be
  • Ex. ESP: many Americans convinced even though weak evidence; however, good we are open-minded but bad we are so convinced

Warning Signs of Pseudoscience

...

...

Download as:   txt (11.4 Kb)   pdf (146.8 Kb)   docx (16.3 Kb)  
Continue for 7 more pages »
Only available on OtherPapers.com