The Bar Chart Shows

Displayed on an informational bar chart is the proportion of many alternatives to dispose waste in four cities, namely Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. One of the more prominent takeaways of the bar chart is that landfill was the most prevalent solution to waste disposal, as a cumulatively higher number of landfill used in the four specific cities mentioned above.

Respectable majorities of landfill were applied to eliminate waste in Toronto and Amman with a number standing 74 percent and one of just south of 50 percent respectively. Among the four disposing ways in Toronto, landfill was by far the most commonplace solution, followed by a fairly inconsequential of 10 percent of Incineration. Recycling and compositing were the two least popular way with negligible figures of eight percent and seven percent correspondingly. A same pattern which is similar to the previously established one was demonstrated in Amman which incineration took the second most popular way with an appreciable of 40 percent, four times higher than recycling. Similarly, the decisively lowest figure was seen in compositing.

Turning to the other two cities which are Madrid and Kuala Lumpur, it is evident that more incineration than any other category was selected. There was a notably greater tendency among Madrid than Kuala Lumpur to discard waste by landfill with a figure of 29 percent of Madrid compared to 26 percent of Kuala Lumpur. In terms of recycling, figures for choosing to recycle was exactly the same in Kuala Lumpur ad Madrid with an unimpressive number of 24 percent. It was with figures for compositing that one sees a slight difference with regards to the percentage of total waste disposal in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur as a consequence of the fact that nine percent of Madrid and seven percent of Kuala Lumpur which was identical to that of Toronto.

In an overall tendency that cannot escape notice, a substantial majority of landfill was considered as a dominant approach to deal with waste disposal.